HISTORICAL RELEASE OF LETTER GRADES UNDERSCORE STATE’S EDUCATION REFORM AGENDA

Oct 05, 2011

BATON ROUGE, La. – To provide communities and families with a clear and meaningful depiction of school performance, today, for the first time in state history, the Louisiana Department of Education released letter grades to schools, districts and the state as a whole. The announcement was made at KIPP Central City Academy, a charter school in the Recovery School District, which achieved the one of the largest academic gains from 2010 to 2011. Through legislation championed by Governor Bobby Jindal last year, Louisiana is replacing its ambiguous star rating system with the same A-F letter grade system used to evaluate students.

“It is simply unacceptable to have 44 percent of schools earning D’s and F’s,” Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Member Chas Roemer said. “If we’re sincere about providing every child with the chance to attend a great school, we have to start by being honest and transparent about where we are and where we need to be. Holding ourselves accountable in the same way we hold our children accountable sends a strong message that we won’t be satisfied until all our students attend A+schools.”

In 2007, nearly 55 percent of Louisiana’s schools would have earned D’s and F’s. That number now stands at 44 percent, which represents a 20 percent decline from 2007. Additionally, the percentage of schools achieving a score high enough to earn an A or B has nearly doubled, from 14.9 percent in 2007 to 28.4 percent in 2011. In the last year alone, the percentage of schools that would have been considered D’s and F’s dropped from 50 percent to 44 percent.

“Louisiana is continuing to improve, and some of our districts and schools are making substantial progress,” Acting State Superintendent of Education Ollie Tyler said. “At the same time, the message is clear. We’re not improving fast enough. And we must all work together to achieve dramatic improvement now – for the sake of our children.”

To Tyler’s point, while the 2.2 bump from the state’s 2010 score denotes more students who are on track, still one-third, or 230,000 students, lack the grade-level knowledge and skills to succeed academically.

“In some cases, where districts and schools have adopted key reforms and proven strategies, they achieved extraordinary gains,” Board of Elementary and Secondary Education President Penny Dastugue said. “But it’s clear we have a lot more work to do.”

Over the last several years, Louisiana has embarked on an aggressive reform agenda, including legislation passed in 2010 requiring teacher and principal evaluations to be based on student growth, the adoption of a new curriculum and assessments that are more closely aligned with college and work expectations, and a relentless focus on turning around the state’s lowest performing schools. In fact, several states have adopted Louisiana’s school turnaround model – the RSD.

While state officials point to significant overall improvement from 2010 to 2011, among the highlights noted is the growth of schools in the Recovery School District, which assumes responsibility for chronically failing schools. Specifically:

For three of the last four years, Louisiana’s school turnaround model has been ranked highest for the percentage of gains achieved from one year to the next.

  1. Schools in the RSD Improved to Achieve An Average Gain of 6.7 Points or 11 Percent -- More than Three Times the Average Statewide Gain for All Schools (2.2 Points, or 2.4 Percent).
  2. If current standards had been in place in 2008, 76 percent of RSD schools would have earned an F. Today that figure is down to 44 percent for RSD schools statewide, and 36 percent for RSD New Orleans schools.

“The mission of the RSD is to transform failing schools,” RSD Superintendent John White said. “And given that our students have made more progress than students in any other district, our schools are on their way to achieving their mission. Nonetheless, the letter grades are a reminder of how much farther the RSD and the state as a whole must advance to ensure our students thrive academically and professionally, regardless of whether they pursue college or the workforce after graduation.”

What is in a Performance Score and Letter Grade?

Each year, schools receive numerical scores known as School Performance Scores (SPS). School Performance Scores reflect two years of data and are calculated for K-6th grade schools using student test scores (90%) and attendance (10%). Schools with a 7th and 8th grade configuration receive an SPS based on attendance (5%), dropouts (5%) and student test scores (90%). High schools (grades 9-12) receive an SPS based on test scores (70%) and their Graduation Index (30%).

District Performance Scores and the State’s Performance Score are a roll up of individual student scores on LEAP, iLEAP and GEE, as well as attendance, dropout and graduation outcomes – calculated using the same formula as School Performance Scores – but using only one year of data.

In 1999, Louisiana set a goal for every school in the state to earn an SPS of 100 or higher by 2009 and for every school in the state to achieve a performance score of 120 by 2014. Growth Goals and Targets are assigned to schools annually based on the success a school makes toward meeting its Growth Target for the previous year and represent the amount of progress a school must make every year to reach the state’s SPS goal of 120 by the year 2014. The maximum amount of growth a school is required to make is 10 points, while the minimum amount is two points. Likewise, District and State Growth Goals and Targets are determined using the same method.

While letter grades are determined by the numeric scale set by BESE, whether a school receives a plus or minus or no symbol following its letter grade is determined by comparing their 2010 Baseline School Performance Score to their 2011 Growth Score. A plus sign (+) signifies a school has improved enough to meet their 2011 assigned Growth Target. A minus sign (-) indicates a school’s 2011 Growth Performance Score has declined by at least one-tenth of a point from its 2010 Baseline Performance Score. If a school does not receive a plus (+) or minus (-) sign, it signifies the school has either shown no growth or in some cases, improved its Baseline Score, but not enough to meet its 2011 Growth Performance Goal.

Based on the grading scale adopted by BESE, in 2011 a top-performing school with an SPS of 120 or above will earn an A. Schools that have an SPS below 65 for the 2010-2011 school year will receive an F. While the scale will change in 2012, letter grades are assigned based on the following scale this year:

2011 Grading Scale

 

Letter Grade

SPS Range

Approximate % Students Below Basic

A

120-200

0-12%

B

105-199.9

13-24%

C

90-104.9

25-36%

D

65-89.9*

37-61%

F

0-64.9*

62-100%

*Scale will change in 2012

An analysis of indicators reveals that from 2010-2011, the state made gains in every category used to calculate the State Performance Score, with the exception of the Non-Dropout Index for K-8 students, which dipped slightly. The greatest point gain in the annual state score is a 2.6 point increase, which occurred in the Assessment Index of 9-12 students. Furthermore, the 2010 report issued today demonstrates consistent and annual reductions in the number of failing schools and a narrowing of prior achievement gaps between students of different races and socio-economic backgrounds.

Improving and Shrinking the Number of Low Performing Schools and Narrowing the Gap

The state’s accountability policy also calls on BESE to establish minimum standards for school performance, which are used to guide interventions. In December 2010, BESE voted to raise the minimum SPS to avoid the state’s Academically Unacceptable School label, beginning this year. Based on the new standard, a total of 115 schools (8.6 percent) earned a performance score below 65 in 2011. This equates to a 17.3 percent drop from 2010, when the performance scores of 139 schools (10.4 percent) fell below 65. Similarly, from an historical perspective, in 1999, 477 schools (40.2 percent) earned an SPS below 65.

Based on the percentage of students earning Basic and above on state assessments, the subgroup data released today reveals the achievement gap between black and white students has narrowed by 11.6 percentage points in English Language Arts (ELA), from 33.7 in 1999, to 22.1 in 2011. In math, the gap has narrowed by 11.2 points, from 37.9 in 1999, to 26.7 points in 2011.

Additionally, a significantly larger number of black students are performing at the level of Basic and above. In 1999, only 32.4 percent of black students scored at least Basic in English; in 2011, that percentage has improved to 56.6 percent. And even a more dramatic sign of improvement - in 1999, 20 percent of black students scored at least Basic in math; in 2011, that figure has more than doubled, to 53.1 percent.

The gap between economically disadvantaged students and all students has also narrowed in terms of students scoring Basicand above on state tests. In 1999, there was an 11.7 percentage point gap between economically disadvantaged students and all students in ELA; in 2011, that gap has narrowed to 7.3 points. In math, in 1999, the gap was 13.2 percentage points; that gap has dropped to 7.7 points in 2011.

Likewise, a significantly larger percentage of economically disadvantaged students are performing at the level of Basic and above. In 1999, only 38.7 percent of economically disadvantaged students scored at least Basic in ELA; in 2011, that percentage has increased to 61.0 percent. And in 1999, 27.3 percent of economically disadvantaged students scored at least Basic in math, compared to 2011, when 59.7 percent of students in this subgroup earned a score of at least Basic on mathematics assessments.

District Highlights

Districts earning A’s and B’s and a place on the State’s District Honor Roll, based on their 2011 District Performance Score, include:

 

District

District Performance Score

Letter Grade

Zachary Community School District

121.3

A

Orleans Parish

118.0

B

West Feliciana Parish

114.2

B

St. Tammany Parish

111.3

B

Plaquemines Parish

110.8

B

Vernon Parish

110.1

B

Central Community Schools

110.0

B

Jefferson Davis Parish

109.9

B

Ascension Parish

109.5

B

Livingston Parish

107.5

B

Allen Parish

107.1

B

St. Charles Parish

106.7

B

St. Bernard Parish

105.9

B

Ouachita Parish

105.3

B

 

The top ten most improved districts, based on the percentage increase in their District Performance Scores from 2010 to 2011:

 

*District

2010 DPS

2011 DPS

Percentage Increase
(Point increase)

Recovery School District (All)

58.4

66.7

14.21% (8.3 Points)

East Carroll Parish

79.4

88.5

11.46% (9.1 Points)

Cameron Parish

93.1

100.6

8.06% (7.5 Points)

Franklin Parish

77.6

83.7

7.86% (6.1 Points)

Red River Parish

86.8

93.6

7.83% (6.8 Points)

St. Bernard Parish

98.4

105.9

7.62% (7.5 Points)

Iberville Parish

80.3

86.2

7.35% (5.9 Points)

City of Baker School District

62.8

67.3

7.17% (4.5 Points)

Orleans Parish

110.3

118.0

6.98% (7.7 Points)

Plaquemines Parish

104.1

110.8

6.44% (6.7 Points)

 

The top districts, based on the percentage of schools meeting 2011 Growth Targets:

 

District

Number of Schools Meeting 2011 Growth Target

Percentage of Schools Meeting 2011 Growth Target

Cameron Parish

3

75.0%

Plaquemines Parish

5

71.1%

Orleans Parish

10

62.5%

Central Community Schools

3

60.0%

Zachary Community Schools

3

60.0

St. Bernard Parish

4

57.1%

Jefferson Davis Parish

7

53.8%

West Carroll Parish

3

50.0%

Ascension Parish

12

44.4%

St. James Parish

4

40.0%

West Feliciana Parish

2

40.0%

State Highlights

One-third of the state’s schools qualified for the state Honor Roll by earning A’s and B’s this year. Specifically, out of the 1,334 schools receiving School Performance Scores (SPS) in 2011, 98 schools, or 7.3 percent earned A’s, and 281 schools, or 21.1 percent, earned B’s. Well over half, 55.9 percent, of Louisiana’s public schools received a or higher. And most schools, 65.1 percent, made gains in 2011, compared to their 2010 SPS. Likewise, 65 of the state’s 70 schools districts, or 92.9 percent, improved their District Performance Score (DPS). And the state’s overall performance score continues to climb, increasing from 92.6 in 2010 to 93.9 in 2011.

In addition, from 2010 to 2011, the number of schools earning a SPS of 100 or higher grew significantly, from 423 schools in 2010 to 503 schools in 2011, representing a 19 percent increase. This increase, coupled with gains in this measure from 2008 to 2010, means the number of schools hitting the mark of a 100 SPS or higher has jumped 58.4 percent over the three-year period. Additionally, over the last three years, the percentage of districts earning a District Performance Score (DPS) of at least 100 has doubled. In 2008, only 9 of 69 (13 percent) had a DPS of 100 or more; based on 2011 scores, that figure has more than doubled to 23 of 71 districts (32.4 percent).

Also, as an indication of systemic and sustainable progress, for the sixth consecutive year, the state’s Growth and Baseline Performance Scores are the highest earned since Louisiana’s launched its accountability system was launched in 1999. And collectively, over the last five years, the state’s Baseline Performance Score has improved by 8.8 points, or 10.3 percent. However the state’s 2011 Growth Performance Score of 94.8, which represents a one year gain of 2.2 points, falls short of the 2011 Growth Performance Goal of 99.0.

For more information related to today’s release of 2011 School, District and State Performance Scores, please refer to the following links:

STATE PERFORMANCE SUMMARIES
2011 Press Conference Power Point (Statewide Results)
2011 State Performance Summary

DISTRICT PERFORMANCE SCORE (DPS) SUMMARIES
2011 District Performance Scores/Letter Grades (Alphabetical)
2011 District Subgroup Assessment Indices (Sorted by District)
District Rankings Based on 2011 District Performance Score
District Rankings Based on Point Change in District Performance Score from 2010-2011
District Rankings Based on Percentage Change in District Performance Score from 2010-2011)
District Rankings Based on Percentage Change in District Performance Score from 2008-2011) 
District Rankings Based on Percentage of Schools Achieving 2011 Growth Target
District Rankings Based on Percentage of Schools Earning Baseline Gains from 2010 to 2011 
District Rankings Based on Percentage of Schools Earning 2011 Letter Grade of or B

SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORES (SPS) SUMMARIES
2011 School Performance Scores/Letter Grades - Alphabetical by District 
(Includes Baseline and Growth School Performance Scores)
School Rankings Based on 2011 Baseline School Performance Score
School Rankings Based on Point Change in School Performance Score from 2010 to 2011
School Rankings Based on Percentage Change in School Performance Score from 2010 to 2011

 # # # # # # # # # #